Questions to parliament about ICPD+15 and funding from around the world

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

Ireland

Jan O’Sullivan, Health Spokesperson for the Labour Party asked the ICPD Parliamentiary Question on behalf of the All Party Group.

To ask the Minister for Foreign Affairs the action he is taking to ensure that Ireland meets the internationally agreed development goals, including the International Conference on Population and Development Programme of Action and the Millennium Development Goals specifically in relation to family planning, reproductive health and in meeting the needs of young people; if he will commit to adequately funding the relevant budget lines to meet these goals; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

Answer

Minister of State, Mr. Peter Power, T.D.

Universal access to reproductive health is one of the goals of the Programme of Action agreed at the International Conference on Population and Development held in Cairo in 1994. The fifth of the Millennium Development Goals, adopted internationally in 2000, aims to reduce the maternal mortality ratio by three-quarters, and to achieve universal access to reproductive health by 2015. The Government is fully committed to action in support of these goals, which will also make a vital contribution in addressing the global HIV and AIDS pandemic.

The Government’s 2006 White Paper on Irish Aid outlines our commitment to supporting the specific health needs of women and girls within the overall approach to health in developing countries. It makes clear that the health needs of women and girls, particularly in the areas of basic healthcare and maternal and reproductive health, must be at the heart of an effective strategy to improve health in the developing world.

Unfortunately, only limited progress has been made on this issue since the Cairo Conference in 1994. Every year, some 500,000 women die and a further 10 million suffer severe illnesses or disabilities as a result of complications in pregnancy and childbirth. Underlying this tragedy is the lack of access by women in developing countries to good quality maternal and reproductive health services, including family planning.

The Government’s aid programme adopts a comprehensive approach in addressing the reproductive health needs of women and young people, through involvement in global policy development, funding and research. Ireland’s assistance is directed at programmes at both global and country levels.

The Government works with several partner agencies in the UN system to address maternal health issues. One of the main obstacles to the achievement of universal access to reproductive health is the lack of empowerment of women in developing countries. The issues involved form the core mandate of the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), with which Irish Aid has a close relationship.

In recognition of its important mandate, the Government has engaged with and contributed substantially to UNFPA. We provided funding of €20.5 million over the three years 2005-2008, covering a range of programmes, including Trust Funds for Global Reproductive Health Commodities Security, Maternal Health, and Obstetric Fistula. Ireland has also funded a joint programme between the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and UNFPA to ensure that the implications of the practice of female genital mutilation are integrated into reproductive health strategies.

Ireland is also working closely with a number of partner countries on these important issues. For instance, in Tanzania , we are working on increasing access to maternal health care; in Ethiopia, we are addressing adolescent reproductive health needs; in South Africa, we are focusing on the prevention of gender based violence; and Irish Aid has been central to the development of maternal health services in Northern Province in Zambia.

France

Mme Bousquet Danielle

Texte de la question: Mme Danielle Bousquet attire l’attention de M. le secrétaire d’État chargé de la coopération et de la francophonie sur l’aide au développement. Elle lui demande de lui indiquer quelles actions le Gouvernement a mené pour garantir que la politique d’aide au développement et de coopération réponde bien aux engagements internationaux pris en matière de développement à la Conférence internationale du Caire sur la population et le développement et ceux pris dans le cadre des Objectifs du Millénaire pour le Développement, en particulier ce qui concerne l’accès au planning familial et à la santé reproductive. Elle lui demande également de préciser quels moyens le Gouvernement entend engager pour atteindre ces objectifs, et en particulier si 10 % du budget de l’aide publique au développement seront effectivement affectés aux programmes de santé reproductive et de population.

Texte de la reponse: L’engagement du Gouvernement français en faveur
des objectifs de la Conférence internationale du Caire sur la population et le développement et des objectifs du millénaire pour le développement se traduit, en premier lieu, par des efforts importants d’aide publique au développement en faveur du secteur de la santé.
Estimées à 970 millions d’euros pour la seule année 2008, ces contributions augmentent chaque année de manière sensible pour atteindre un total cumulé de 5,42 milliards d’euros sur la période 2000-2008. Les priorités de l’aide française dans le domaine sanitaire convergent avec celles du programme d’action du Caire et les OMD liés à la santé, ainsi que l’illustre le niveau des contributions au titre de l’année 2007 : lutte contre le VIH/Sida et les maladies transmissibles (633 millions d’euros), santé maternelle (38 millions d’euros), santé infantile (27 millions d’euros). Les efforts particulièrement intenses dans la lutte contre le VIH/Sida, reflet d’un engagement historique au plus haut niveau, sont destinés à financer des activités de prévention, de soins et de prise en charge des malades, mises en oeuvre dans le cadre d’instruments internationaux, dont le Fonds mondial de lutte contre le sida, la tuberculose et le paludisme (300 millions d’euros), la Facilité internationale d’achats de produits de santé UNITAID (160 millions) et le Fonds européen de développement (116 millions d’euros). S’agissant plus particulièrement de la santé reproductive, la France apporte son soutien financier à de multiples programmes, qu’ils soient mis en oeuvre par voie bilatérale, au travers de l’Agence française de développement, ou par voie multilatérale, par le biais d’organismes onusiens, dont notamment le FNUAP, l’UNICEF et l’Organisation mondiale de la santé. Une assistance technique est également fournie, essentiellement en Afrique sub-saharienne (Dakar, Niamey, Addis-Abeba), afin d’appuyer l’élaboration et la mise en oeuvre de politiques de santé maternelle et reproductive, que cela soit à l’échelle nationale ou sous-régionale. La France participe par ailleurs à renforcer les connaissances en la matière, au travers d’un programme de recherche, de développement et de formation mis oeuvre par l’OMS. Au total, sur la période 2003-2008, l’aide publique au développement en faveur de la santé reproductive s’élève à 80 millions d’euros. Par ailleurs, la France considère le renforcement des systèmes de santé et d’éducation des pays en développement comme un enjeu majeur qui conditionne la réalisation des objectifs du Caire et celle des OMD. L’aide versée à ce titre, sur la période 2000-2007, est estimée à plus de 2,8 milliards d’euros (dont près des deux tiers pour l’éducation). L’engagement français en faveur des systèmes sanitaires et scolaires se traduit également par le soutien actif à divers initiatives et partenariats internationaux dont notamment l’initiative Providing for Health et le partenariat International Health Partnership pour la santé et l’initiative Fastrack pour l’éducation).
Enfin, le ministère des affaires étrangères et européennes joue un rôle important en matière de plaidoyer, au sein des instances internationales, afin de garantir l’accès universel à la santé et aux droits reproductifs, notamment au travers de la promotion de l’égalité des genres et de la planification familiale. Aux côtés de ses partenaires, en particulier européens, le ministère entend contribuer à faire progresser ces thèmes de manière significative dans les agendas internationaux sur le développement et sur les enjeux globaux.
Dans cette perspective, la France a récemment intégré le partenariat international public/privé Reproductive Health Supply Coalition qui, en réunissant l’ensemble des acteurs impliqués dans le domaine de la santé reproductive, du Nord comme du Sud - institutions publiques, agences de développement, organisations non gouvernementales, fondations, secteur privé - vise à améliorer l’accès des pays en développement aux produits et services en la matière.

UK

Chris McCafferty MP

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what steps he is taking to ensure his Department’s policies meet internationally agreed development goals in relation to provision of services relating to family planning, reproductive health and meeting the needs of young people; and if he will allocate 10 per cent. of overseas development assistance to population assistance.

Reply

Mr. Ivan Lewis: The Department for International Development (DFID) accepts that there is a large, well documented, unmet need for family planning and is working to address this. We provide significant resources to improve access to sexual and reproductive health information, services and supplies (e.g. contraceptives). DFID supports the core work of the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) with £8.5 million per annum and is providing £100 million to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) over the five-year period to 2013 to increase access to reproductive health commodities. Our bilateral programme supports contraceptive supply directly in several developing countries.

The UK Government are also committed to spending £6 billion on strengthening health systems and services over the seven years to 2015. Strong health education programmes, including targeted youth services, sexual and reproductive health and maternal health programmes are key elements of a well functioning health system.
DFID does not plan to adopt the target of allocating 10 per cent. of overseas development assistance to population assistance. DFID’s country-led development approach is to support recipient governments to spend development assistance on the priorities they set themselves for helping their people out of poverty. DFID is committed to working to the Paris Principles concerning donor harmonisation and as part of this strongly supported the outcome of the recent the Accra High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness to drive partner country ownership and leadership and for donors to support this.

The question can be accessed in the official Hansard Report at http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmhansrd/cm090430/text/90430w0008.htm#09043032000068
 

Romania

Senator Tudor Udristoiu

-Romania supports MDG related international initiatives, such as the Call to Action initiative of Prime Minister Gordon Brown (Romania joined this initiative in July 2008), and the EU-Africa Partnership on the MDGs (Romania joined the Education dimension of the Partnership);
-Romania supported also the adoption of the EU Agenda for Action on the MDGs, at the June 2008 European Council;
-Romania’s ODA focuses, in a first stage, on certain priority areas where national experience and comparative advantages can be capitalized on, namely: promotion of human rights; consolidation of democracy; economic development; education;
-Health is a priority area in which Romania is prepared to contribute with ODA; in the period 2007-2008, the Romanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs allocated from the ODA budget a series of contributions to programs run by UN agencies, including in relation to reproductive health:
-In 2007 – contributions to the UNFPA budget, the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, and the UNICEF general budget;
-In 2008 – contributions to the UNFPA budget (for projects in the Republic of Moldova and in Serbia), the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, and the UNICEF general budget.

-The project for the Republic of Moldova (July 2008-June 2009) focused on reproductive health, domestic violence and social inclusion, and aimed at facilitating access of vulnerable groups to basic services, social protection and inclusion;
-The project for Serbia (September 2008-September 2009) focuses on the social inclusion of Roma population (implementation of the Romanian model in three municipalities);
-In 2008 and 2009, the Romanian Public Health Ministry contributed also to the WHO budget and the UNFPA general budget;
-During the period between 2007 and 2010, the Romanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the UNDP are implementing jointly a cooperation program whose aim is to build institutional capacity and to raise public awareness regarding the development cooperation. Within this framework, a public campaign entitled “Pay it forward!”, was launched in the 5 most important Romanian cities, and consisted of: awareness raising activities on the MDGs and on Romania’s role in supporting them, in its new capacity as ODA donor; information and awareness raising among young people on MDG 6; promotion of the UNITAID system.     

Sweden

Ameer Sachet

During the UN conference om pop. And dev in 179 states agreed on a plan of action with focus on improving people’s sexual and reproductive health and rights – working for improved gender equality, access to services and councelling, sexuality education, contraceptives and safe abortion in countries where abortion is legal.
Year 2000 the MDGs were agreed upon and in six years these are to be met. Hoever, it is unlikely that they will be met and MDG 5 on improved maternal health is the one which is the furthest from the target. Due to this the world has agreed on MDG 5 b – with the goal of universal access to Reproductive health – a goal with a very strong connection to the ICPD.

It has proven tobe very difficult to track the exact figures on the percentage of the Swedish Dev assistance that goes to MDG 5 and 5b and to SRHR. The multilateral assistance, so called core support, and it is difficult to know how much of this that goes to SRHR. The bilateral dev assistance is reported in line with specific criterias and budget lines. Within healthsystem dev there are several budget lines and it is difficult to know how much out of these that are to SRHR.

Against this background I ask the Minister: What action is the Minister willing to take to improve the ways of tracking how much of our ODA that goes to SRHR?

Answer

Dev Minister: Gunilla Carlsson

It is true, as pointed out, that it is hard to get accurate statistics on the percentage of methods for follow up and tracking the results of dev assistance to gender equality, including SRHR.

Maternal deaths continue to be very high in dev. countries. The difficulties in meeting MDG 5 is often connected to attitudes and resource distribution that limit women’s influence and rights. Improvement of gender equality, increased respect for women’s and girl’s rights, is one of the governments 3 thematic priorities of the dev assistance.

SRHR including maternal health is a special focus within this priority. During 2009 the government gives 100 million SEK to Sida with the aim to increase the work we do in the field of maternal health. 

Today Dev Assistance goes, among other things, to regional initiatives in Africa, the global partnership Women Deliver, to UNFPA, to initiatives on sexuality education and education for midwives and other health care staff, information on and access to contraceptives, initiatives for improvement of antenatal care and deliveries and to org working with the right for safe and legal abortion.

In Sweden’s international policy, SRHR is a very broad field with several central components closely related and dependent of each other. Sweden gives in total more than 1.6 million to SRHR related initiatives. For example – 120 million to a broad health sector support to Bangladesh to improve maternal health care and women’s SRH. Sweden also gives support to different UN organizations and to international NGOs such as IPPF. Sweden is the second biggest donor to UNFPA with 450 million SEK an increase with 50 million from  2008. 290 million SEK is given to Unaids, an increase with 48 million SEK. Through Sida 196 million was given to IPPF and other organizations working with SRHR.
Written question
Maternal health
By Johan Linander (c)
To Minister Gunilla Carlsson
The MDGs consist of 8 dev goals. In six years they are to be met. The 5th goal is the one the furthest from being met. Every year more than half a million women die as a result of pregnancy, unsafe abortion or delivery afor 15-19 year old girls. To reduce Maternal deaths, women’s health and rights must be much more prioritized than today, both politically and financially. I would like to say that the situation would have been a lot better today if men were giving birth, risking to die during pregnancy and delivery.  Against the above background I want to ask the Minister:

What action the Minister is willing to take to make sure that Sweden and the EU, with among other things our development assistance, will be able to do more to make sure that the MDG 5 is met year 2015.

Answer

Minister Gunilla Carlsson
Maternal death continues to be very high in dev countries. Complications in connection to pregnancy and delivery is one of the biggest underlying causes of women’s and girl’s ill-health around the world.
Therefore, better results regarding the fulfillment of MDG 5 also influence the fulfillment of MDG 1 on povery and MDG 3 on gender equality.

According to the most recent report on MDGs from the UN the maternal deaths been reduced with less than 1 % between 1990 and 2006. This is unacceptable.

Reducing maternal deaths is very important in itself, but apart from this the connections between women’s health and economic growth is getting more and more clear. Women’s and girl’s ill-health and death due to lacking SRHR result in reduction in productivity and growth.

Improvement of gender equality, increased respect for women’s and girl’s rights and strengthening of their possibilities, is one of the governments 3 thematic priorities of the dev assistance. SRHR including maternal health is a special focus within this priority. During 2009 the government gives 100 million SEK to Sida with the aim to increase the work we do in the field of maternal health. 

Sida is goingto channel these extra funds both through laready existing structures but also through new initiatives. Support is given, among other things, to regional initiatives in Africa, the global partnership Women Deliver, to UNFPAs new fund for working against maternaldeath, to initiatives on sexuality education and education for midwives and other health care staff, information on and access to cheap and qualitative contraceptives for adults and for adolescents, initiatives for improvement of antenatal care and deliveries and to org. such as IPAS working with the right for safe and legal abortion and treatment and care after complications due to unsafe abortions.

The government is also actively working in the EU with gender equality and we were involved in MDG 5 being clarly visible in the council counclusions of a EU Agenda of Action on the MDGs.
Last fall, before the MDG summit in NY, I, as a member of this government, was given an MDG 3 gender equality torch. One of the obligations I made was to support the work to reduce maternal death. Johan Linnader, I can assure you that I will follow this work closely.

Belgium

1. Mondelinge vraag van mevrouw Olga Zrihen aan de vice-eersteminister en minister van Buitenlandse Zaken en aan de minister van Ontwikkelingssamenwerking over «de 42ste zitting van de Commissie Bevolking en Ontwikkeling van de Verenigde Naties» (nr. 4-635)

2. Mondelinge vraag van mevrouw Sabine de Bethune aan de vice-eerste minister en minister van Buitenlandse Zaken en aan de minister van Ontwikkelingssamenwerking over «de participatie van België aan de Commissie Bevolking en Ontwikkeling van de Verenigde Naties» (nr. 4-646)

The minister of foreign affairs at that time gave a coordinated answer on both questions which you could consult on the following link (in Dutch or French):

http://www.senate.be/www/?MIval=/consulteren/publicatie2&BLOKNR=5&COLL=H&LEG=4&NR=64&SUF=&VOLGNR=&LANG=nl

In his answer the minister engages to consult civil society and parliament with regard to the Belgian position on ICPD +15;

Civil society drew up recommendations (in English) which can be seen at the following website

http://www.platformpopdev.be/index.asp?nb=branch14&lang=NL

back

4 Responses to “Questions to parliament about ICPD+15 and funding from around the world”

  1. 05/07/2010 at 2:19 pm

    There are precious few scientists like Professor Emeritus Gary Peters who have chosen not to remain silent but instead to accept their responsibility to science by rigorously examining extant evidence of human population dynamics. Please consider now the perspective of Dr. Peters on the research of Russell Hopfenberg and David Pimentel, which is found in the journal, The California Geographer, 2009. The title of his article is, Population, Resources and Enviroment: “Beyond the Exponentials” Revisited.

    —begin

    “The world’s population in 2009 was close to 6.8 billion. According to the U. S. Census Bureau, we can expect about 55.7 million people to die this year, so in purely demographic terms 300,000 deaths amount to just over half of one percent of all deaths. Furthermore, there are about 15,465 births per hour worldwide, so again in a purely demographic sense those 300,000 deaths can be replaced in less than 20 hours.

    Paradoxically, the very fossil fuels that have allowed us to feed the vast increase in world population over the last century or two may 113 The California Geographer n Volume 49, 2009 also be starting to increase mortality rates, even if only slightly so far. Currently we add about 80 million people to the planet each year, and we know that population growth exacerbates most environmental problems, including global warming (Speth 2008, Diamond 2005, and Friedman 2008).

    Pimentel (2001), Hopfenberg (2003), and others have established in a series of articles that human population growth is a function of food supply, yet we continue to expand food supplies to accommodate future growth—even if that growth threatens the planet’s socioeconomic systems, ecosystems, biodiversity, oceans,
    and atmosphere. Continued expansion of food supplies has come at considerable cost both to people and to Earth. As Pollan (2008, 121) commented, “Clearly the achievements of industrial agriculture have come at a cost: It can produce a great many more calories per acre, but each of those calories may supply less nutrition than
    it formerly did…. A diet based on quantity rather than quality has ushered a new creature onto the world stage: the human being who manages to be both overfed and undernourished, two characteristics seldom found in the same body in the long natural history of our species.” According to Heller and Keoleian (2000), it takes seven to ten calories of input, mainly from fossil fuels, to produce one calorie of edible food in the United States. Looking at the American landscape, Babbitt (2005, 100) observed that “[I]ndustrial agriculture has been extended too far, and the price has been too high for the land and waters to bear.” In many places, agricultural landscapes are no longer what Tuan (1993, 143) had in mind when he wrote that “In common with the vast majority of humankind, Americans
    love the small intimate world that is their home, and, immediately beyond it, a rich agricultural land.”

    According to Pimentel (2001), humans already use more than half the planet’s entire biomass, leaving less and less for other species. From there, as Hopfenberg (2009, 2) noted, “It is not a far logical leap to determine that, if human population and resource use continues to grow and we continue to kill off our neighbors in the biological community, one of the many species facing extinction will be the human. Thus, the impact of civilized humanity on the rest of the
    biological community can be seen as lethal to the point of destroying our own ecological support”. It is a reminder that, as Bush (2000, 28) noted, “If there is one lesson that the geological record offers, it is that all species will ultimately go extinct, some just do it sooner than others.” With the expansion of human numbers has come a steady increase in the background rate of extinction.

    But even among environmentalists, population has been dropped from most discussions because it is controversial; it has been snared in the web of political correctness. As Speth (2008, 78) somewhat ironically pointed out, “By any objective standard, U.S. population growth is a legitimate and serious environmental issue. But the subject is hardly on the environmental agenda, and the country has not learned how to discuss the problem even in progressive circles.” Cobb (2007, 1) put it this way, “Even if some politicians, policymakers and reporters in wealthy countries can see beyond the daily mirage of plenty to the overpopulation problem, they do
    not want to touch it.”

    —end

    It is one thing for “politicians, policymakers and reporters” not to touch research of human population dynamics and the human overpopulation of Earth. It is something altogether different when the elective mutism of scientists with appropriate expertise hides science in silence. Such a willful refusal to scrutinize peer-reviewed and published evidence and report findings strikes me as a betrayal of science and also a denial of what could somehow be real.

    How are global challenges of the kind we can see looming before humanity in our time to be addressed and overcome if any root cause of what threatens us and life as we know it is not acknowledged?

    Of course, it could be that Professor Peters’ assessment of the research by Pimentel and Hopfenberg is incorrect; that their work is fatally flawed. If that is the case, we need to know it. On the other hand, if that is not the case and the research is somehow on the correct track, then discussion of the research needed to have begun years ago, at the onset of Century XXI, because this research appears, at least to me, to possess extraordinary explanatory power with potentially profound implications.

    Thanks to those within the community of scientists and to those in the population at large with a perspective to share who choose to examine the evidence to which your attention is drawn and report your findings.

    Steven Earl Salmony
    AWAREness Campaign on The Human Population, established 2001
    sustainabilitysoutheast.org

    User Steven Earl Salmony
  2. 22/07/2011 at 3:25 pm

    “Why is Man failing?” is the question. Of course, there are likely many recognizable, understandable and acceptable responses to that query. Having made this acknowledgement, I remain dumbstruck by one glaring and willful failure. It is the conscious and abject failure on the part of many too many top ranking professionals with appropriate expertise and extant scientific evidence to respond to one central question, the rejection of which appears to be allowing ‘ the stage to be set ‘ for big trouble that takes its shape in the form of some unimaginable sort of colossal, human-induced global ecological wreckage.

    **** Is the population dynamics of the human species essentially similar to or else different from the population dynamics of other species? **** The implications of the correct response to that single query appear profound.

    User Steven Earl Salmony
  3. 23/07/2011 at 1:26 pm

    ‎’The brightest and the best’ are bought and paid for by “the highest bidders,” who then are aided and abetted in the sale of the Earth to the lowest bidders. If the creation of concentrated wealth continues to be the highly regarded driver of purposeful activity it is today, then the probable destruction of the Creation is the already recognizable result. If human beings with feet of clay keep silent, and by so doing consent to what is happening as the Earth is being ravaged, its climate destabilized and its environs degraded by pollution, then some among us in the DE community may witness something unimaginable, I suppose. And if not us, then surely the children will. Given the gigantic scale and the growth rate of human overproduction, overconsumption and overpopulation activities now rampantly overspreading the surface of Earth, the likelihood of some sort of colossal ecological catastrophe appears virtually inescapable. Such are the vicissitudes of life now, in a soon to become patently unsustainable world ruled by the ‘virtue’ of greed. On the other hand, perhaps greedmongering will be eschewed and other behavioral changes toward sustainability are to be beheld in the offing.

    If changes are not made, perhaps the children will look back in anger and utter disbelief at what my generation of elders is doing now in our planetary home that is certain to prove beyond a shadow of doubt how far we are willing to go in order to protect a patently unsustainable way of life based upon outrageous greedmongering, even if our greediness leads to the death of life as we know it; and even it our foolhardiness causes the destruction of the children’s future. The children will see that human beings with feet of clay can be directed by self-proclaimed masters of the universe among us to precipitate a colossal global wreckage as well as that greed can rule the world absolutely.

    User Steven Earl Salmony
  4. 24/04/2012 at 6:45 pm

    We are going to make a difference. Thanks for all you are doing. It is so refreshing to be among people who are seeking knowledge of human population dynamics/overpopulation, rather than obstructing that effort or else plainly, consciously and deliberately playing stupid in a ‘rear-guard’ defense of a catastrophe-in-the-making status quo.

    User Steven Earl Salmony

Leave a Reply